posted by ![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
revdorothyl at 07:20pm on 27/12/2009 under movie reviews
revdorothyl at 07:20pm on 27/12/2009 under movie reviewsJust a quick movie review note:
My brother and I went to see the "Sherlock Holmes" movie this afternoon (I might've skipped it in preference for something like "Up in the Air" with much better reviews, but "Holmes" was what brother wanted to see), and I was pleasantly surprised by how much more there was to it than indicated in the previews.
Yes, there are a lot of action scenes and explosions and brawling (none of which I normally associate with the Arthur Conan Doyle detective or his better film incarnations), but there is also more. These may not be the Holmes and Watson we expect, but they're really interesting and entertaining characters, and very well-acted, I thought.
The mystery isn't really such a mystery in this film, but the character work makes it an entertaining film. Not a profound film, certainly, but it's worth a look-see.
My brother and I went to see the "Sherlock Holmes" movie this afternoon (I might've skipped it in preference for something like "Up in the Air" with much better reviews, but "Holmes" was what brother wanted to see), and I was pleasantly surprised by how much more there was to it than indicated in the previews.
Yes, there are a lot of action scenes and explosions and brawling (none of which I normally associate with the Arthur Conan Doyle detective or his better film incarnations), but there is also more. These may not be the Holmes and Watson we expect, but they're really interesting and entertaining characters, and very well-acted, I thought.
The mystery isn't really such a mystery in this film, but the character work makes it an entertaining film. Not a profound film, certainly, but it's worth a look-see.
There are 4 comments on this entry.