revdorothyl: missmurchsion made this (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] revdorothyl at 08:59am on 09/10/2003 under
[refers to events in last night's "Angel"]

Yes, I loved last night's new episode of "Angel" (5.02 "Just Rewards") -- loved it so much that I had to watch the tape twice over this morning again, when I should have been getting ready to drive 9 hours to visit good friends. I loved it for the glorious snarks, of course, but what really kept me going back was the intriguing and somewhat disturbing ideas it raised. Because I'm running so late (as usual!), I can only jot down some rough thoughts right now, and hope to polish them (or, possibly, deeply regret them!) later.

Did it strike anyone else that both times when Spike FADED out (not talking about the time when the necromancer yanked him instantaneously from one room to another in mid-word) it was just as or just after he'd been railing against the injustice of his current, noncorporeal existence as a reward for his having so heroically saved the world? In Fred's lab, he'd started raging against the powers that be for not letting him rest in peace after he'd gone and saved the world and everything, when he faded out, mid-rant. And in the necromancer's mansion, Spike was -- in his usual, charmingly un-subtle fashion -- expressing some resentment against Angel and what he perceived to be Angel's undeserved luck, contrasting that with the raw deal which he'd received, even after hurling himself on the proverbial hand-grenade, for love and honor and all the right reasons. In that case, whoever or whatever is responsible for yanking him out of his ghostly existence and (as he indicated to Fred, in the show's concluding scene) dangling him over the abyss, let him stick around just long enough to hear Angel's counter-rant, before fading him out again. So, Angel was able to point out that the big injustice from HIS perspective was Spike's apparently glib acceptance of the whole soul thing (that something which had been forced on Angel and had him suffering for 100 years before he could even start to have some sense of hope and purpose, had been freely CHOSEN by Spike and had taken relatively little adjusting to -- "three weeks moaning in a basement, and then you're FINE with it! Where's the justice there?").

So, from my perspective, it seems that whenever Spike (however rhetorically) asks for JUSTICE in return for his self-sacrifice in "Chosen," someone or something is not-so-delicately hinting that, RIGHT AT THIS MOMENT, justice might not go in his favor. Instead of the hero's reward, it's "the other place, the place of fire and torment," that seems to await him, if he is to be judged on his merits right at this moment (on the theory that the heroism and self-sacrifice and fighting the good fight that he'd engaged in, mostly for love of Buffy, in the past few years was apparently still not enough to outweigh his terribly bloody past, which had made him second only to Angel in the "awful crimes of vampires" hall of fame, as we were carefully reminded early in the episode). Does this imply that Wofram & Hart, and being tied to Angel's broody self, is somehow Spike's chance at Purgatory? His chance to refine and purify his soul (which I, along with many ardent Spike-fans, already thought was plenty refined and pure, shining through the pose of the monster, in words and looks too numerous to cite), being forced by his noncorporeal state to go beyond the passions of blood and flesh that he was always so good at and REALLY grapple with the spiritual and intellectual side of his existence? His chance to learn how to fight for good with something more than "fists and fangs"? At any rate, that "psychopomp" thing certainly seems to be developing.

While a belief in Purgatory is not part of my own religious tradition, it DOES seem to fit in with the over-all theology of "Angel," where Angel himself (during torture at the hands of Spike's hireling in "In the Dark") admits that what he wants most of all is forgiveness, but he wants to EARN it. Yes, he seemed to advance beyond that in Season 2 of AtS, coming to the conclusion by mid-season that he could never be good enough to truly even the scales for all his evil deeds, but we've still got that on-going sense that Angel SHOULD feel repentance and continue to atone. Perhaps the paradigm shift, at least as far as the character Spike is concerned, has been from the much more open-ended theology of BtVS to the stricter moral demands of AtS's world-view? Maybe.

What I do know is that, while Angel's dismissive "three weeks moaning in a basement" vastly under-stated what Spike had really suffered in season 7 of BtVS -- see, for example, his heart-rending words and actions at the end of "Beneath You," his agony when he's chained in Buffy's basement and telling her that the things he's done (done to girls Dawn's age, especially) mean that she MUST stake him before the First can make him kill again, and his torture by minions of the First (which he withstood through his conviction that BUFFY believes in him, in his capacity to change and be a good man) -- Spike is NOT "Mr. Introspection," usually. As he told Buffy just before he simply held her while she slept through the night, he doesn't consider himself a great thinker, but the one thing he KNOWS, BELIEVES, is SURE of is HER.

Perhaps the big shift for Spike this year will be to find a moral universe, a belief system, a personal compass for himself that DOESN'T revolve around BUFFY. Yes, I love the Spuffy, and I will continue to love the Spuffy. But we've always known that there's more to Spike than that. If Spike remains incorporeal, if he perhaps starts to look beyond his sense of injustice (which the very stern powers that be of Angel's universe don't seem to have much patience with), we may see a spiritual journey this year which is in some ways even more impressive than the one he's already completed.
There are 6 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
luminosity: (So Real)
posted by [personal profile] luminosity at 03:44pm on 09/10/2003
Lovely post, which has touched on many of my thoughts about the Spike situation, only so much more articulately. Spike cries for justice, but he forgets that he has been the recipient of the flip side of that coin--mercy. He really doesn't want justice because it seems that "justice" is that he'll go to hell. It's a very immature part of Spike's personality, IMO, to demand justice without giving mercy (to him) its due.

This subject also touches on another theory of mine re the Jossverse--vessels of destruction. Some characters are just damned. Period. No matter what they do. And vice versa. Although there is room for redemption, we don't really know what that entails, and if anyone (excepting Darla, IMO) can obtain it.
 
posted by [identity profile] revdorothyl.livejournal.com at 10:00pm on 14/10/2003
Thanks for your thoughtful comments! I'm so glad you mentioned the "mercy" thing -- as I was driving down the road later that day, I had ample time to think, "Oh! Of course! I was supposed to connect Angel's comments about mercy being stronger than conviction in last week's episode to this week's cries for justice. Duh!" (a 9-hour drive always gives one plenty of time to think of what one should have seen or said or done). I think you're right that Spike is totally forgetting about or discounting (not being a great thinker, and all) the mercy that's been shown to him, including all the times that Buffy could have killed him but didn't, even before he started fighting the good fight.

As for Spike being a vessel of destruction (which I can't help reading in a Calvinist light, whatever the Apostle Paul might have intended to say about that), I hope that's not what's going on. I hope he isn't predestined to be damned, no matter how hard he fights for salvation. I'm not saying that there isn't a little buried Calvinism in the Jossverse, and particularly in that corner of it inhabited by Angel and his crew, but I'm loath to believe that's what's going on here. Of course, I could be wrong.

BTW, if there are vessels of destruction in the Jossverse, does that also mean that there are vessels of salvation, predestined to be saved no thanks to themselves? It's a fascinating train of thought you raise.
 
posted by [identity profile] keswindhover.livejournal.com at 04:29pm on 09/10/2003
RevD - this is interesting. I was just reading Superplin's brain dump on this episode, and you two seem to be coming to some of the same conclusions (or at least looking at the same ideas) from two different directions:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/superplin/47002.html#cutid1

 
posted by [identity profile] bonnied.livejournal.com at 03:39pm on 10/10/2003
I actually pretty much responded to this in our Yahoo group, but I'm just discovering the power of LJs and how easy it is to access all your friends' latest entries. So, I just had to say more.
Good point about Spike getting a 'reminder of hell' every time he started to rant about what he justly 'deserved'. I wonder if the writers were thinking that deeply or if it was just coincidence. More and more I have less and less faith in ME writers. I think the fans read volumes more into stuff than what was ever intended.
 
posted by [identity profile] appomattoxco.livejournal.com at 01:36am on 13/10/2003
I can't believe I didn't catch the timiing for his fading spells and you could have a point.

I'm not so sure that ME thinks as much about this stuff as we do. Just the fact that there is room for this kind of speculation makes it more fun than most shows on T.V.though.

I'd like to add you to my friends if that's alright with you.

Melissa
[founding member over-thinkers anon.]
 
posted by [identity profile] revdorothyl.livejournal.com at 10:01pm on 14/10/2003
No problem -- I'm always happy to friend and be friended by thoughtful, interesting people. Thanks for your encouraging words.

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17 18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31