posted by
revdorothyl at 05:14pm on 28/05/2008 under movie reviews
Just a quick note to say that I ended up seeing "Prince Caspian" (the second of the "Chronicles of Narnia" film adaptations) this past Sunday afternoon, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Granted, my expectations weren't too high, based on the very unsympathetic reviews I'd heard on radio and television AND on the fact that of all the Narnia books I finally made time to read in seminary (a couple of decades ago!), Caspian is the only one about which I couldn't remember a single thing, suggesting that I hadn't found it a particularly compelling story in print, either.
But the movie surprised me in that I didn't find it at all too long, nor did I find the battle scenes excessive in any way. The battles are a much larger part of the story than they were in "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe" and Aslan plays a much, much smaller role, but I vaguely remember that that's the way the story goes in this second book of the Chronicles.
Plus, it was a pleasure to see older sister Susan getting the chance to be pretty darn heroic in this film version, which was a welcome updating to what I remember of C.S. Lewis' depiction of her character.
And how could I NOT love a movie in which Eddie Izzard provides the voice for Reepicheep, the incredibly heroic mouse version of Scaramouche?
Given the way two of my co-workers who'd seen the new "Indiana Jones" movie over the weekend were tearing it to shreds for being markedly worse than "Temple of Doom" (which I myself consider to be a pretty pointless installment in the series, since it takes place before the important, life-changing events in "Raiders of the Lost Ark" and seems to reveal nothing about Jones' character nor make any lasting contribution to his relationships), I am left with that rather smug "Mary of Bethany" feeling: I have chosen the better portion, which shall not be taken away from me.
Though I'll probably eventually see "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" in a budget theater, or when there's nothing else to see in a matinee, just for the sake of seeing Karen Allen's character as part of the Indy mythos again. (So, there goes all my smugness!)
Granted, my expectations weren't too high, based on the very unsympathetic reviews I'd heard on radio and television AND on the fact that of all the Narnia books I finally made time to read in seminary (a couple of decades ago!), Caspian is the only one about which I couldn't remember a single thing, suggesting that I hadn't found it a particularly compelling story in print, either.
But the movie surprised me in that I didn't find it at all too long, nor did I find the battle scenes excessive in any way. The battles are a much larger part of the story than they were in "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe" and Aslan plays a much, much smaller role, but I vaguely remember that that's the way the story goes in this second book of the Chronicles.
Plus, it was a pleasure to see older sister Susan getting the chance to be pretty darn heroic in this film version, which was a welcome updating to what I remember of C.S. Lewis' depiction of her character.
And how could I NOT love a movie in which Eddie Izzard provides the voice for Reepicheep, the incredibly heroic mouse version of Scaramouche?
Given the way two of my co-workers who'd seen the new "Indiana Jones" movie over the weekend were tearing it to shreds for being markedly worse than "Temple of Doom" (which I myself consider to be a pretty pointless installment in the series, since it takes place before the important, life-changing events in "Raiders of the Lost Ark" and seems to reveal nothing about Jones' character nor make any lasting contribution to his relationships), I am left with that rather smug "Mary of Bethany" feeling: I have chosen the better portion, which shall not be taken away from me.
Though I'll probably eventually see "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" in a budget theater, or when there's nothing else to see in a matinee, just for the sake of seeing Karen Allen's character as part of the Indy mythos again. (So, there goes all my smugness!)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I did see Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and adored it. I haven't laughed with that much pure pleasure in a long time. My goal is to do a review of it, as I seem to be in a small minority of people who really enjoyed it.
good to hear an encouraging word on new "Indy"
(no subject)
Prince Caspian has one of my favorite lines in all the series:
Witches are never really gone. You can always get them back.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I was so worried about Caspian but when I saw it and they had done right by my beloved Reepicheep I was happy. I only got him for two books so I was going to be thoroughly put out if he was sidelined.
The book Caspian is told largely in flashback so it's not as engaging as some of the others for many people. I can't wait for Dawntreader!
(no subject)
In fact, I recall being tickled to death by the way it opened (isn't that the one that talks about Eustace's name, and how he almost deserved it?). Plus, again, you have a not very promising character (rather like Edmund through most of the first book) who's redeemed in the end, with more than a little help from Aslan and friends.
(no subject)
I really liked the way they portrayed Edmund in the movie. Very much as someone who had learned the lesson. The subtitle could very well be Peter's an idiot, which was pretty much the way it was in the book as well. Edmund running the sword through the White Witch was sheer perfection, been there, done that, not going back.
(no subject)