revdorothyl: missmurchsion made this (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
Belatedly getting around to trying to put my reactions to this week's new "Angel" episode into coherent form (I've had a mass of grading to do this week and got stomach flu over the last couple of days, just for good measure). I've now seen the episode "Shells" twice through, and here's a bit of what I think.


I. "A Play on Perspective" (or, 'Objects in Mirror may be Closer than they Appear')


I'm going to try to set aside, for the moment, certain qualms I have about the idea of anything in this world -- or out of it -- having the power to consume and destroy a soul that doesn't belong to it, that wasn't GIVEN to it in some sense (I don't have a Bible handy at the moment, or I'd look up the passage which says not to fear those who can kill the body, but rather fear those who can kill the soul [it's Matthew 10:38], because I THINK the context implies that you have to GIVE your soul into their power or make it vulnerable to them through some choices of your own -- and I'm not sure that Fred's decision to come to work at W&H is quite enough to put her soul on the Old Ones' buffet table).

Instead, let's look at all the shifts and twists in perspective in this episode, all the times when something you take to be one thing actually turns out to be another. The following conversation occurs as Spike has returned to his complaints about tiny airline bottles of whiskey on the return flight from England, likening the tiny bottle to a REAL drink that's just very far away.


Angel: What does that mean? Really?
Spike: It's...a play on perspective.
Angel: Gone. What does it mean that she's gone?
Spike: Well, in the world of men, a person dies, they stay that way.
Angel: Unless you're a vampire.
Spike: Or the ghost of one that saved the world.
Angel: Or Buffy. Death doesn't have to be the end. Not in our world. Rules can be broken. All you have to do is push hard enough.

On one level, at first hearing, I'm reading that as Joss Whedon's (though I know he didn't personally write this episode) explanation for why the apparent theology of the Buffyverse differs markedly from his own avowed atheistic beliefs: in the real, human world, death is the end, no exceptions, no happy endings; but in the world of the fantastic, you can play around with that, break otherwise immutable laws of physics and philosophy and entertain the possibility that there's ALWAYS a way to go on, a way to bend reality ever so slightly to one's will in the game of "What if . . . ?" That reading may or may not be valid.

But on another level, and on second viewing, knowing what's coming later in the episode, I'm seeing this dialogue as a warning that the breaking of rules and continuation of Fred will NOT go according to expectations. That this will be, in some sense, a "shell game" -- a variation on that old scam where you're supposed to find the pea under one of the three rapidly shifting walnut shells, but the pea is NEVER there when you've put your money on the line, because -- as often noted before -- "the house always wins."


II. "The Old Shell Game" (or, 'The Demon is Quicker Than the Eye')


Shortly after Spike and Angel return to W&H, Wes once again asserts, forcefully, that Fred is GONE, there IS no Fred anymore.


Wes: I watched it gut her from the inside out. Everything she was is gone. There is nothing left but a shell.
Angel: Then we'll figure out a way to fill it back up.
Spike: The thing only took over her body. It's the tip of the theological.
Angel: It's the soul that matters.
Spike: Trust us. We're kind of experts.
Gunn: What about her...if her organs have been liquified?
Spike: [raising his hand] Flash-fried in a pillar of fire saving the world. I got better.

Beyond all the Python-esque associations raised by the phrase "I got better!", I couldn't help but think -- second time through -- that drawing parallels between Fred's condition and Spike's recent history was a rather nifty way to signal in advance that things would NOT go according to plan or fit neatly into the categories Angel and Spike and everyone were trying to draw.

Several years before Spike's internal organs (along with every other part of him) were flash-fried while closing the Hellmouth and saving the world, he presented us with the fascinating conundrum of a soul-less vampire who was capable of love and loyalty and other human virtues, and who actually aspired to be more than the compassion-less, connection-less, conviction-less creature of evil that his job description had seemed to call for. Though William's soul was only supposed to be lost, rather than completely destroyed, when Dru made him into a demon, somehow something of the poet -- the man of feeling (if not talent)-- survived, burned into the very cell structure of the undead Spike.

And similarly, it seems, though there's nothing left to bring back (no toothpaste to be stuffed back into Fred's tube) because Fred's soul was "consumed by the fires of resurrection" (again, I'm temporarily tabling my extreme uneasiness over THAT particular bit of phrasing), yet something remains.

Illyria tells Wes that there ARE fragments of Fred in her, memories electrically channeled into Illyria's "function system" as Fred was dying and Illyria was being reborn. With no armies of doom to rise at her command and cleanse the earth of humanity, Illyria is stuck between worlds, as she reluctantly confesses to Wes.


Illyria: I have nowhere to go! My kingdom is long dead. Long dead. There's...so much I don't understand. I become overwhelmed. I'm unsure of my place.
Wesley: Your place is with the rest of your people, dead and turned to ash.
Illyria: Perhaps. But I exist here. I must learn to walk in this world. I'll need your help,...Wesley.

I'm trying not to flash back to Anna Sheridan in the Babylon 5 episode "Z'ha'dum" (telling John that HIS Anna, the woman he loved, is gone and can never come back, and that SHE is just what was made IN that Anna, but that given a chance she can love him just as well as the real Anna did -- if he'll just climb down off that balcony and be reasonable about the Shadows). But, setting aside that hint of deja vu, I AM sort of intrigued by the idea that Wes is being given the opportunity to make a new soul out of Fred's memories and Illyria's discomfort in this body that looks so much like Fred, but not.


Wesley: ...I'm probably the last man in the world to teach you what's right.
Illyria: But you will. If I abide, you will help me.
Wesley: Yes.
Illyria: Because I look like her.
Wesley: ...Yes.
Illyria: [contemplating her sarcophagus] We cling to what is gone. Is there anything in this life but grief?
Wesley: There's love. There's hope, for some. There's hope that you'll find something worthy, that your life will lead you to some joy. That, after everything, you can still be surprised.
Illyria: Is that enough? Is that enough to live on?

Answers to that question will have to be continued later, since the library is closing. More tomorrow.
Mood:: 'rushed' rushed
There are 5 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] missmurchison.livejournal.com at 06:16am on 06/03/2004
More tomorrow.

Yes, please. I want more.

I liked this episode, but I was disturbed by the Spike who once pointed out, "there are always consequences," agreeing so quickly to Angel's plan.

And I hope you're feeling better!
 
posted by [identity profile] revdorothyl.livejournal.com at 12:03pm on 09/03/2004
"I was disturbed by the Spike who once pointed out, 'there are always consequences,' agreeing so quickly to Angel's plan."

A very good point -- Spike was dubious enough about the wisdom of Willow "rattling the dead" (as he put it) in "After-Life", but now suddenly he's gung-ho to bring Willow in to re-ensoul Fred. Maybe the fact that Fred's body was still walking around, and doing evil, made the difference in his mind, though -- it wasn't analogous to raising Buffy from the dead in season 6 of BtVS, so much as it was like re-ensouling Angelus during AtS season 4/BtVS season 7. At least from his perspective.
 
posted by [identity profile] soundingsea.livejournal.com at 08:48am on 07/03/2004
I'm trying not to flash back to Anna Sheridan in the Babylon 5 episode "Z'ha'dum" (telling John that HIS Anna, the woman he loved, is gone and can never come back, and that SHE is just what was made IN that Anna, but that given a chance she can love him just as well as the real Anna did -- if he'll just climb down off that balcony and be reasonable about the Shadows).

What a great comparison. Layers and levels, oh my. Thanks for drawing this parallel - it adds to my enjoyment!
 
Thanks for enjoying that comparison. I sometimes worry that comparing episodes of "Buffy" or "Angel" to events on other genre TV shows in the past marks me as a 'hopeless case' or media SF geek.

But what the hey, I DO love and have on tape almost every episode of "B5" and "DS9" and "Alien Nation" and several key episodes of "Farscape" and other "Trek" series. And I AM intimately acquainted with every science fiction-ish show produced during the 'wilderness years' of the 1970's and 80's, when you watched it, no matter how bad or good it might be, because you were damn lucky to get ANY science fiction on TV, and most of the time you had none [and these kids today, they don't know how spoiled they are, 'cause in MY day you had to walk five miles through the snow to see a "Star Trek" re-run, and ... oops, there I go again, lapsing into curmudgeonliness]. "Planet of the Apes", "Man from Atlantis", "Fantastic Journey", "Logan's Run", "Battlestar Galactica" and "Galactica 1980", "Buck Rogers", "Wonder Woman", "The Bionic Woman", "Misfits of Science", "V", "The Phoenix", "Wizards and Warriors", "Voyagers", the British imports on PBS ... unsung masterpiece, guilty pleasure, or memory-I'm-trying-to-repress, I saw them all.

And then the universe smiled upon us, and there was CGI, and it was good and less expensive to produce, and there was J. Michael Straczynski, and he was good (and he begat Sheridan and Delenn and G'Kar, who were very, very good), and there were story-arcs on a "Trek" series set in the liminal gray areas of a space station somewhere between reason and faith, and then there was "Xena" and she was good (especially when she was being bad), and then there was Joss Whedon and "Buffy", and lo, it was very, very, VERY good. Guess it's time I give this a rest, eh?
 
posted by [identity profile] harmonyfb.livejournal.com at 10:15am on 10/03/2004
I, too, am uneasy with the bald statement that Fred's soul was "consumed" or "destroyed." In my worldview, souls cannot be destroyed, only moved between incarnations. Seems to me that you've hit the nail on the head referencing the "shell game."

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17 18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31