(miss murchison made me do this). Entering the "dorkiness" stakes : comments.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17 |
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
Re: Regency Buck
Yeah, I must admit that there's something dead sexy about the alpha-male/take-charge hero -- as written by Heyer, at least! When I first read Regency Buck in 8th or 9th grade, I remember being strongly attracted by Lord Rule, while feeling guilty about it and resentful at the same time -- ambivalent about that kind of "father-figure" which both attracts and inspires rebellious counter-reaction in me. I want to kiss him and slap him at the same time. Sir Tony in The Masqueraders stirred up some of the same feelings, but since he was written as much more laid-back (most of the time), he had a "safer" feel to him.
However, I recall being most inspired to slap first and think about the possibility of kissing long afterwards by the hero in Faro's Daughter -- I quite see why Deb Grantham wanted so much to smack him down (even if she did find kidnapping and bondage a bit too far for her taste). I think the redeeming quality of a sense of humor in the hero (however ascerbic or dry that wit might be) was mostly lacking in that hero (Max? was that his name?), while usually humor was a prominent feature of the Heyer hero and covered a multitude of paternalistic sins.
Re: Regency Buck
well-endoweda fine figure of a man. :) Also, I agree that he doesn't have as much of a sense of humour as some, but he really is motivated by love for his ward, so we know that he has a capacity for love before we ever meet Deborah.The Masqueraders - I liked Sir Tony, but there were a couple of references in the book that made me think he was not only tall and broad shouldered, but possibly also rather too well-padded (his sister teases him for eating too much).
I liked the hero of The Toll-Gate and The Unknown Ajax as to the physical type described. Tall, broad-shouldered (okay, so I have a type, so sue me :)), slow-speaking but deceptively quick-witted, slow to move but utterly implacable when roused, knowing their strength to an inch (to quote one of them).
But I thought Sylvester was one of her best heroes - genuinely flawed, like the heroine, and we could only hope that they would manage to pull it off because it really wasn't guaranteed, but I liked both of them very much.
Re: Regency Buck
I'll have to re-read these again, before I can honestly say what I currently think about them.
Thanks for giving me the impetus!